What's New I Sitemap I Bibliography I Vortigern I Vortigern Studies l Wansdyke I POLLS I LINKS l Sitemaster I FAQs |
Vortigern Studies > Vortigern > Guest Articles > Frank Reno (1) |
Vortigern Studies Index |
Like so many other egnimatic figures such as Utherpendragon, Vortimer, and Ambrosius Aurelianus in the saga of King Arthur, Vitalinus is hidden in a haze. In the Historia Brittonum, his name appears twice. The first is in Section 49, where the reader is informed that "Vitalinus is the son of Gloui. Bonus, Paul, Mauron, and Vitalinus were four brothers, sons of Gloui, who built the great city on the banks of the River Severn that is called in the [sic] British Caer Gloui, in English Gloucester." In Section 66 the second passage reads, "And from the [beginning of the] reign of Vortigern to the discord between Vitalinus and Ambrosius are 12 years." Those are the only two appearances of the name Vitalinus in British history, deceptively suggesting that Vitalinus must indeed be a very minor character in the Arthurian saga. Yet once again, there is a gossamer thread about Vitalinus which can be traced, and the key lies in the variant of his name. Translations of the Historia Brittonum use the name Vitalinus. However, in the original Latin version his name is Guitolin/Guitolini, rendered into English as Guithelinus. It is this variant name (Guithelinus) used by Geoffrey of Monmouth which transforms Vitalinus' seemingly minor part into a role of major importance in Arthuriana. Although there are critics who deride Monmouth's work as an unreliable historic source, he has no hidden agenda or motive in relation to Guithelinus. In truth, in this instance he can be portrayed as a copist because he doesn't grandstand Guithelinus' role nor does he pad the story with his imaginative creations.
What this does, however, is form a chain from the single links: Guithelinus is the son of Gloui; Guithelinus helped to build Caer Gloui (Gloucester); Guithelinus was a figure of consequence and became the Bishop of Gloucester; Guithelinus rose in rank to the Archbishop of London; Guithelinus was involved in political and military affairs; Guithelinus became the protector of Utherpendragon and Aurelius; Guithelinus was instrumental in perpetrating a Roman return to the island. One of those links has to be scrutinized in more detail, and that is the passage in the Historia Brittonum which relates that there was discord between Vitalinus and Ambrosius Aurelianus (vis-a-vis Aurelius Ambrosius, vis-a-vis Arthus) 12 years into Vortigern's reign. In both The Historic King Arthur and Historic Figures of the Arthurian Era* I concentrate upon the word discordiam used to describe sentience between Vitalinus and Ambrosius. I disagree with any translation which characterizes the disagreement between Vitalinus and Ambrosius as a bellum (a war) or proelium (a battle), in spite of the Historia's addendum that the disagreement caused the Battle of Wallop. Although most scholars view Vitalinus' and Ambrosius' relationship as adversarial, I accept the word discordiam at its face value: discord, disagreement, argument. This interpretation seems to be borne out by the chronological reference to "12 years into Vortigern's reign." At that time, Arthus would have been in his early teens, and, knowing his heritage, undoubtedly wanted to rightfully claim the throne rather than acquiesing to Vortigern's claim. Vitalinus realized the folly of that, knowing that Vortigern would probably assassinate the young aspirant. Because of thediscord and Vitalinus' sense of duty as a guardian, he crossed to Brittany with his young ward to wait for a more auspicious time. An interesting artifact which for some reason has been overlooked is the Vitalianus Stone in the graveyard at St. Brynach's Church in Nevern, Wales. It came to my attention through Ralph and Beatrix Davis, the owners of the Manor House Hotel in Fishguard, after my first book had already been published. As an Arthurian enthusiast, I thought it an incredible find. When I first viewed it about five years ago, its inscription, 'Vitalianus Emerato', was legible, but in the interim lichen has obscured the epitaph. This churchyard, in addition to the Vitalianus Stone, has the bilingual gravemarker for Maglocunus map Clutor, an ancestor of the Maglocunus recorded in the Annales Cambria and the king castigated by Gildas Badonicus. This likewise is the same graveyard where "Caman Llan" is located, one of the possible sites I've proposed for Arthur's fatal battle. *See the indices (Guithelinus, Vitalinus, discordiam) in both books for all the specific details. **See Historic Figures of the Arthurian Era, Photo 14, page 225, for the close-up inscription on the stone. Photo 5 on page 142 shows how much weathering has taken a toll on the stone when compared to the photo at the right. Bibliography:
Vitalinus/Guithelinus is Copyright © 2001, Frank D. Reno. All rights reserved. Used with permission. Comments to: Frank D. Reno |
VortigernStudies is copyright © Robert Vermaat 1999-2008. All rights reserved |