![]() What's New I Sitemap I Bibliography I Vortigern I Vortigern Studies l Wansdyke I POLLS I LINKS l Sitemaster I FAQs |
Vortigern Studies > Vortigern > The Sources > Eutropius |
Vortigern Studies Index |
Flavius Eutropius was a contemporary of Ammianus Marcellinus, and went with him on campaign in Julians disastrous Persian war. Eutropius later became the court historian for the emperor Valens (364-378), until the latters tragic death at the hands of the Goths at Adrianople. We know little else about his life, but he should not be confused with Eutropius the Eunuch, his more notorious contemporary, who was an advisor to the Emperor Arcadius and Consul in 399. During his time at Valens court, Eutropius wrote a ten-book compendium of Roman history entitled Historiae Romanae Breviarium (A Concise History of Rome). Eutropius was translated into Greek in AD 380 by Paeanius as well as by a certain Capito (whose writings are now lost). Besides Orosius and Bede, Eutropius was used both by Jerome (early 5th century) and Hincmar of Reims (ca AD 806-882). Britain Eutropius provides details of the British campaigns of Caesar, Claudius, Nero, Vespasian and Trajan, as well as later happenings in Gaul. His description of Claudius' conquest of Britain in AD 43 is based partly on Tacitus: Historiae
Romanae Breviarium VII, 13 Eutropius also provides details on the successful campaign of Vespasian in Britain: Historiae
Romanae Breviarium VII, 19 In discussing Nero's reign, Eutropius refers to Boudicca's almost successful rebellion: Historiae
Romanae Breviarium VII, 14 Hadrians wall Eutropius is partly responsible for the mistaken references by later historians about the construction and appearance of Hadrians Wall. Eutropius attributes the construction of the Antonine Wall to Septimius Severus (who did in fact refurbish it): Historiae
Romanae Breviarium VIII, 18 This inaccuracy was picked up by Orosius in his Historium adversum paganos libra VII, who was later used by Gildas in his de excidio et conquestu Britanniae. Gildas dated the wall even later, to the times of Stilicho, but he might have had a reconstruction in mind. This reference had its consequences. Bede also copied this mistake in his 8th century Historia ecclesiastica gentis Anglorum, dating the wall again back to Severus: Bede,
Historia ecclesiastica gentis Anglorum, 11 But Bede had become even more confused by Gildas, who, through Orosius, in fact invented another wall. Bede, who knew through Eutropius from the (mistaken) trench of Severus, by which he even might refer to the Vallum, mentioned in a later chapter the building of the Antonine (turf) wall, but then also (again!) the building of Hadrians wall: Bede,
Historia ecclesiastica gentis Anglorum, 12 Thus the building of Hadrians wall in the second century did become a wall of the third and finally the late fourth or even early fifth century.
|
![]() |
VortigernStudies is copyright © Robert Vermaat 1999-2007. All rights reserved |